|
The media quickly became a forum for those interested in
the boundaries between provincial education requirements and individual
religious rights, many forgetting that the preservation of both was a
hallmark of a democratic society. Given the lack of precedent in the area,
the public was engaged in furious debates.
The Mennonite community at Linden was charged with
truancy for acting against Alberta’s School Act in favour of their beliefs,
as outlined in the Bible. A pacifist group, they chose to keep to
themselves, refusing to be engaged in any sort of confrontation, including,
but not limited to, that mandated by law. At the time, there were six other
breakaway Mennonite schools located in Alberta. Members of the respective
communities kept current with the developments of the case, some even
travelling to be present during the trial, offering support to their
brethren. Individuals from the Mennonite community reminded Albertans of
promises of religious freedom made to their forefathers who settled the
country over 100 years before, stating that if their rights were not
protected, they would consider relocation to a district that could protect
the right to their faith.
On the other side, professional associations were up in
arms. The Alberta School Trustees Association (ASTA) annual conference was
characterized by a strong undercurrent of feelings on either side of the
debate, dividing its members along ideological lines like never before. Some
individuals felt state involvement was necessary to ensure educational
standards for children, even if it overruled the wishes of their parents.
Many felt the provincially granted teacher’s certificate was the only
guarantee the students would be taught effectively. Others believed that
parents who wanted their children to be taught with a philosophy different
from the majority of the populace had rights as well, and believed that
quality in teaching personnel could be defined in more than one way.
Regardless of all of the preliminary debating, everything
rested on the trial and Justice Oliver’s subsequent verdict. Upon hearing
that Elmer Wiebe was found not guilty, many individuals felt the foundation
of the provincial education system was threatened and perceived an appeal
was imminent. However, nothing of the sort ever materialized.
|
 |
 |