|
In times of difficulty and dispute,
there exists law to provide a clear and direct path to reason and justice.
Previous to the Norman Earl Lewis case of 1918, there were three relevant
pieces of legislation in place, including the Militia Act of 1906, the War
Measures Act of 1914, and the Military Services Act of 1917, each outlining
procedure for all matters concerning conscription.
The Militia Act of 1906 stated that
"all male inhabitants of Canada of the age of 18 years and upwards and under
60, not exempt or disqualified by law shall be liable to service in the
Militia" and that "the Governor in Council may place the Militia or any part
thereof on active service anywhere in Canada and also beyond Canada for the
defence thereof, at any time when it appears advisable to do by reason of
emergency."
The War Measures Act of 1914 provided
that “the Governor in Council shall have the power to do and authorize such
acts and things, and to make from time to time, such orders and regulations,
as he may by reason of the existence of real or apprehended war, invasion or
insurrection, deem necessary or advisable for the security, defence, peace,
order and welfare of Canada.”
In 1917, the government created a
third piece of legislation that addressed conscription. The Military Service
Act placed restrictions on who could be called upon for mandatory military
service. Those exempted included farmers and farm labourers, who were needed
to continue providing food in a time of shortage.
For the first three years of the First
World War, enlistment in military service was voluntary and approximately
300,000 men joined up. However, when news of the high casualty rates were
reported in Canada, it deterred many from service, forcing the government to
enact a plan to circumvent a lack of enlistment.
On April 20, 1918, an order-in-council
was passed that removed exemptions outlined in the Military Service Act of
1917, leaving farming operations across the country short of labour and
those who were called for service wondering if their rights had been
maintained.
|
 |
 |